Valkyrie, dir. Bryan Singer, AMC Loews Lincoln Center 13, NYC
At long last, Bryan Singer’s consistently postponed Valkyrie hit theaters this past Christmas, actually a few months ahead of schedule. The controversy surrounding the film, which provided about two years of delectable biz luncheon gossip, will be forgotten with time, and thankfully so because the resulting film is a slick little addition to Mr. Singer’s short but monumental resume. It is a great little thrill ride that manages to suck you in and convince you of a daring concept, that not all Nazis are bad. In fact, the film is so good at pulling this parlor trick off early on that the audience is even able to sympathize with those most devilish of SS officers.
Based on the real-life attempt to to assassinate Adolph Hitler from within the Third Reich, the film follows the exploits of Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, played with surprising refrain by Tom Cruise. The megastar has trouble slipping into historical roles, evidenced by his twenty-first century charm on full display in Ed Zwick’s 19th century drama, The Last Samurai. In that ambitious project, Mr. Cruise appeared to be reprising his role as Jerry Maguire only with more hair and a sword. Not so this time around. Thanks mostly to the visceral pace of Christopher McQuarrie and Nathan Alexander’s screeenplay, Mr. Cruise is never afforded the chance to be cute or charming. Instead, we spend the better part of two and a half hours watching the world around him spin out of control while he desperately tries to keep himself grounded in the middle of it all.
On one end of the spectrum in Valkyrie is, of course, Hitler and his Third Reich. As von Stauffenberg divulges via voice-over-diary entries in the beginning, our heroes feel as if Hitler had turned the German empire, initially a concept they all supported, into something so evil, that if left on its current course it could very well mean the end of the world. The detractors wanted to let the world know that not all Germans, not all Germany, supported their megalomaniac chancellor’s ideals. And so, after surviving an airstrike in Tunisia, less an eye and a few fingers, von Stauffenberg is brought to Berlin to join an elite group of conspirators, which is where he is confronted with the other end of the spectrum, the politicians. If Hitler represents pure evil, then this gaggle of blowhards represent the bureaucratic fumbling that allow evil to exist. Being the heroic type that he is, von Stauffenberg refuses to participate unless they canfind a way to control Germany after the impending death of the Führer, fearing just ano0ther dictatorship brewing amongst the opportunistic clan.
The most interesting scene of the film, for my money, happens when an SS captain who has been charged with arresting Nazi officers accused of treason (not von Stauffenberg and friends, but the bad Nazis), is pitted face to face with Joseph Goebbels. Standing alone in an immense office, Goebbels pops a cyanide pill under his tongue as the captian approaches, clutching a telephone receiver. He hands it to the captain; hearing Hitler’s voice on the other end, he realizes he has been duped, and retreats. What is so fascinating is that both men are what we know to be pure evil, and yet Mr. Singer found a way to hook us in, to feel for both men, to feel the imminence of their doom in that moment.
Hopefully this is a jumping off point for the director, whose resume is saturated with blockbuster genre pictures, even though he exploded on the stage with the “indie” success The Usual Suspects. Mr. Singer has more access than almost any director his age, so we can hope to see more of this fare from him in the future, though we love the superhero stuff too.
