Skip to content

Review: Hancock

The world of fic­tion is nei­ther lack­ing dis­en­fran­chised anti-heroes nor tongue-in-cheek smashi­ness, yet “Hancock” stands in sharp relief against the back­drop of love affair with all-powerful beings. For one, it grace­fully shies away from tak­ing itself too seri­ously with­out los­ing it’s foot­ing in real­ity, a feat that was mud­dled on oppo­site ends of the spec­trum in recent block­busters such as “Spiderman” and “The Incredible Hulk”. Even more impres­sive is the fact that inter­na­tional super­star Will Smith is kept at bay, fit­ting into the story nicely rather than hav­ing it built around him. No doubt, he steals the show deliv­er­ing his trade­mark wit with a new-found bit­ter after­taste, but the real star here is the steady hand of direc­tor Peter Berg.


Keeping him­self qui­etly under the radar his con­tem­po­raries have cov­ered in brightly col­ored blips, Mr. Berg trudges forth mak­ing some of the most impor­tant American films within the Hollywood sys­tem. His track record is short but glow­ing, from the too-dark-for-comfort com­edy “Very Bad Things” back in 1998 to the more recent so-action-packed-everyone-missed-its-message “The Kingdom”, he has proven him­self adept at bounc­ing between gen­res, blow­ing tons of shit up, and keep­ing his audi­ence gen­er­al­ly sat­is­fied if not a bit rat­tled. “Hancock” is no excep­tion, going against every arche­type thrown at crowds over the past decade while keep­ing the action fresh and bloody.

Instead of the film being the req­ui­site ori­gin story of our scruffy, drunken and mis­be­got­ten Hancock, Mr. Berg, with writ­ers Vy Vincent Ngo and Vince Gilligan, have cho­sen instead to make the decon­struc­tion of a hero. Rather than a dorky teen get­ting zapped with mag­nif­i­cence com­ing to terms with his new-found pow­ers, Hancock is instead a thirty-something bum who has honed his abil­i­ties enough to use them, just not to use them prop­erly. Mr. Smith looks a bit dif­fer­ent than when we last saw him in “I Am Legend”. Sure he’s got a hair­cut that’s a bit new and dif­fer­ent, but the lengths he has gone to chan­nel this char­ac­ter have changed his phys­i­cal­ity in a way that is dif­fi­cult to describe but won­der­ful to expe­ri­ence. I almost didn’t rec­og­nize him in some scenes, which is impres­sive since he is one of the most rec­og­niz­able stars inter­na­tion­ally. He still fights the forces of evil, but there is no men­tion of who he is or why he can fly, smash, throw, and retard flames. Instead we see his daily tra­vails in the court of pub­lic opin­ion, a pub­lic who hates him and would rather he didn’t try to fight crime in such an un-thought out manner.

Enter the PR guy, Ray Embry, played with the usual comedic restraint by Jason Bateman. You can tell that Mr. Berg is a real Hollywood guy because of all the easy jokes toss­ing a pub­li­cist into a hero film might elicit. As a favor for sav­ing his life, Ray offers to take Hancock on as a client to soften his image, but it is clear that he wants to do more than just help Hancock out. Ray is on a mis­sion to make the world a bet­ter place through an ill-fated char­i­ta­ble mar­ket­ing ploy he has come up with, and he sees the oppor­tu­nity to make at least Los Angeles safer by improv­ing the erst­while hero. Just as he spun gold out of Mark Loring in the oth­er­wise business-as-usual “Juno”, Mr. Bateman has found a way to con­vey an incred­i­ble char­ac­ter in Ray. He believes in Public Relations so much, that he really believes he can save the world by mold­ing Hancock into an image of his design.

Rounding off the award-winning cast is Charlize Theron as Ray’s wife Mary. Sporting a rather plain (for a room full of gor­geous women) blond looks, she is a lov­ing wife with some obvi­ous skele­tons in her closet. For the sanc­tity of plot we are left in the dark through­out the first half of the film about her past, though we are beaten over the head with rea­sons to look out for her, such as shots that linger on her for too long or glances we notice for no known rea­son. Mr. Berg really paints the whole femme fatale thing on her nicely; we are just wait­ing to see how she is going to screw every­thing up.

I don’t want to spoil the sec­ond half of this film for any­one, but I have to say that the cli­max, in which we wit­ness the undo­ing of Hancock and his choice to put him­self back together, is deeply mov­ing. Hancock is an immor­tal with no rea­son to live. It is refresh­ing to see a well devel­oped char­ac­ter make the core choices that define him under the guise of an action-packed laugher.

All overblown intel­lec­tu­alisms aside, it was great see­ing shit blow’d up, jerky kids being knocked around, and Ms. Theron get­ting her skank-face on. Cheers to you, “Hancock”, for giv­ing us what we’ve always wanted: unapolo­getic schlock with a heart of gold.

Categories: Movies, Reviews.

Tags:

Comment Feed

No Responses (yet)



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.